That being said, here are some considerations regarding wrapping or removing asbestos siding:
Safety: Asbestos, when damaged or disturbed, can release hazardous fibers into the air, which can pose health risks if inhaled. Wrapping the asbestos siding with a protective material, such as a non-asbestos vinyl or aluminum siding, can encapsulate the asbestos and prevent fiber release. However, if the existing siding is significantly damaged, deteriorating, or poses a higher risk of fiber release, removal might be the safer option.
Legal requirements: Laws and regulations regarding asbestos removal vary by jurisdiction. It's crucial to check local regulations and consult with licensed asbestos abatement professionals to determine the specific requirements for your area. They can provide guidance on whether wrapping or removal is the preferred method based on safety and compliance.
Cost: The cost of wrapping versus removing asbestos siding can vary depending on factors such as the size of the project, the condition of the existing siding, and local market rates. Generally, wrapping tends to be less expensive than complete removal, as it involves covering the existing siding with a new material. However, it's important to obtain multiple quotes from reputable contractors to compare the costs and make an informed decision.
Aesthetics and longevity: Consider the desired appearance and longevity of your home's exterior. Wrapping asbestos siding can provide a fresh look while maintaining the original structure, but the underlying asbestos siding will remain. On the other hand, complete removal allows for the installation of new siding options that may better suit your aesthetic preferences. Additionally, new siding materials often come with warranties that can offer long-term protection.
Again, it is crucial to consult with professionals experienced in asbestos removal or encapsulation to assess the specific condition of your siding, understand local regulations, and make an informed decision based on safety, legality, and cost-effectiveness.